Discover Insights

Why Legal Teams Over-Preserve Data (And What It’s Actually Costing Them)?

GCs Draw on Consulting, Technology, and Process to Transform Legal Departments

GCs in Australia continue to be under pressure to “do more with less.” Seeking volume discounts from external law firms isn’t enough anymore. “It isn’t transformative and will not generate substantial true savings in the long term,” writes Vice President of Corporate & Commercial Services Nick Boymal in his recent article in The Australian.

“We are finding more legal departments are working with enterprise legal service providers to take a holistic rather than piecemeal approach to analysing the entire department. They are drawing on a combination of consulting, introduction of technology, and changes to process.”

Read more

Related Content

Why EDRM 2.0 Matters: Preserving Simplicity While Reflecting Today’s Discovery Reality 

The original EDRM became an industry standard because it translated complex legal and technical workflows into a visual framework that was intuitive and easy to understand.  

The Copilot Paper Trail: What Legal Teams Need to Know 

Understanding where Copilot-generated information lives and how it’s captured is essential to avoiding gaps, missteps, or unnecessary risk during litigation.

High Stakes, Human Judgement: Applied AI for Legal and the EU AI Act

A practical, legal expert-guided report on responsible AI use that aligns to the EU AI Act.

Investment Flows: How Patent Data Can Turn the Tide on Water Innovation

The analysis spans more than 180,000 global patents across four key areas of water technology