A trademark, a brand’s unique fingerprint, is more than just a name or logo. It’s a powerful asset, a silent guardian of a business’s reputation and market value. Think of it as the secret sauce that sets a brand apart from the crowd. From tech giants like Apple and Google to luxury fashion houses like Chanel and Gucci, trademarks are the cornerstone of their success. By protecting these valuable words, phrases, symbols and/or designs, companies can deter counterfeiters, stop copycats, and safeguard their hard-earned brand equity.
Trademark infringement happens when someone uses a brand or logo without permission, potentially misleading consumers. For instance, if a new company starts selling shoes with a logo strikingly similar to Nike’s swoosh, that could be considered trademark infringement.
To protect their brand, trademark owners send a cease-and-desist letter, request the removal of infringing products online, or conduct physical searches and seizures to stop the unauthorized use.
What is trademark litigation?
Trademark litigation is the legal process of resolving disputes related to the unauthorized use of trademarks. If less formal methods like cease-and-desist letters or takedown notices fail to stop trademark infringement, a trademark owner may resort to a lawsuit.
For example, if a new coffee shop opens using a logo that closely resembles Starbucks’ iconic siren, Starbucks could file a trademark infringement lawsuit to protect its brand.
The Lanham Act, also known as the Trademark Act of 1946, is the primary federal law governing trademarks in the United States. It provides a comprehensive framework for protecting trademarks and preventing their unauthorized use, from trademark registration, management, and maintenance with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to prohibiting the unauthorized use of a trademark that is likely to cause confusion, trademark dilution, false advertising, and cybersquatting.
What are the main claims in trademark litigation?
In trademark litigation, the main claims are trademark infringement, unfair competition, and trademark dilution.
Trademark infringement: This occurs when use of a mark by another would likely confuse consumers as who is providing the product or service in question. To establish likelihood of confusion, a trademark holder lists factors such as proximity of competition trademarks (same geographic region, similar marketing and advertising channels employed, etc.); similarity of competing trademarks (e.g., design); and evidence of consumer confusion.
A recent high-profile example involving similar trademarks is the case of Under Armour vs. Armorina. Under Armour, a well-known sportswear brand, sued Armorina, a smaller fitness apparel company, for trademark infringement. Under Armour argued that Armorina’s use of the word “Armorina” was too similar to its own trademark “Under Armour” and could confuse consumers. The court ruled in favor of Under Armour, finding that Armorina’s use of a similar mark was likely to cause consumer confusion and dilute the distinctiveness of Under Armour’s brand. This case highlights the importance of protecting trademarks, even from smaller companies, to prevent consumer confusion and maintain brand integrity.
Unfair competition: This is a broad term that includes infringement, and occurs when a trademark is used in a way that creates a false impression about the original or a product or service.
In the case of 3M vs. 3N, 3M, a multinational conglomerate, took legal action against Changzhou Huawei Advanced Material Co. Ltd. over the use of the name “3N” on their products. Despite the differences in products and pricing, 3M argued that the similarity of the names could mislead consumers and infringe on their well-established trademark. 3M contended that Changzhou Huawei’s use of “3N” was a strategic move to capitalize on 3M’s reputation and gain an unfair advantage in the market. The court ultimately ruled in favor of 3M, recognizing the potential for consumer confusion and unfair competition.
Trademark dilution: A trademark owner may claim trademark “dilution,” asserting that it owns a famous mark and the use of someone else’s mark diminishes the strength or value of the trademark owner’s mark by “blurring” the mark’s distinctiveness (e.g., an appliance company putting white apple logos on their products, thus diluting Apple’s trademark) or “tarnishing” the mark’s image by connecting it to something distasteful or objectionable-even if there is no likelihood of confusion (e.g., using luxury brand Tiffany blue for diaper packaging).
A recent high-profile example of trademark dilution and infringement involved the luxury brand Louis Vuitton and a South Korean fried chicken restaurant. The restaurant, originally named “Louis Vuiton Dak,” used a logo and packaging style that closely resembled Louis Vuitton’s designs. Louis Vuitton successfully sued the restaurant for trademark infringement, arguing that the similarity in name and branding could mislead consumers and dilute the luxury brand’s reputation. The court ordered the restaurant to change its name and cease using the infringing logo and packaging.
(Of note, the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA) protects famous marks from unauthorized use, but certain uses of a famous mark, such as fair use, parody, satire, editorial commentary, and news reporting.)
The trademark litigation process
Trademark litigation is a complex legal process that involves various stages, from pre-action correspondence to final judgment.
- Pre-action correspondence: The trademark owner typically initiates the process by sending a cease-and-desist letter to the alleged infringer, outlining the infringement claims and demanding that the infringing activity cease.
- Filing a complaint: If the cease-and-desist letter is unsuccessful, the trademark owner may file a formal complaint with a court. The complaint outlines the specific allegations of trademark infringement, including the nature of the infringing activity and the harm caused to the trademark owner.
- Discovery: The discovery phase involves both parties exchanging relevant documents, information, and evidence to support their claims, and can include interrogatories, depositions, and requests for production.
- Trial: If trademark litigation is not resolved through settlement, it proceeds to trial, during which the parties present their evidence and legal arguments to a judge or jury. The court considers several factors when determining whether trademark infringement has occurred, including strength of the trademark, similarity of the marks, consumer confusion, and intent of the infringer.
- Judgment: After considering the evidence and arguments presented, the court will issue a judgment or equitable relief. Possible outcomes of a trademark litigation case include: an order requiring the infringer to stop using the infringing trademark; monetary damages to compensate for the harm caused by the infringement; an order requiring the destruction or forfeiture of infringing products; and reimbursement of legal fees incurred by the prevailing party.
By understanding the trademark litigation process, businesses can better protect their intellectual property rights and take appropriate action to address infringement.
Safeguarding your brand
In today’s competitive business landscape, protecting your brand is crucial. By implementing a proactive approach that includes trademark searches, filings and other trademark prosecution and maintenance activities, and on and offline monitoring, businesses can significantly reduce the risk of infringement.
Partnering with experienced IP professionals can further enhance your brand protection strategy, providing expert guidance and efficient management of your trademark portfolio. By taking these steps, you can safeguard your brand’s reputation, market share, and long-term success.
Stay ahead of threats to your brand. Let’s talk.
