Discover Insights

Who Owns AI Risk? Guardrails for Legal and Compliance Teams 

GCs Draw on Consulting, Technology, and Process to Transform Legal Departments

GCs in Australia continue to be under pressure to “do more with less.” Seeking volume discounts from external law firms isn’t enough anymore. “It isn’t transformative and will not generate substantial true savings in the long term,” writes Vice President of Corporate & Commercial Services Nick Boymal in his recent article in The Australian.

“We are finding more legal departments are working with enterprise legal service providers to take a holistic rather than piecemeal approach to analysing the entire department. They are drawing on a combination of consulting, introduction of technology, and changes to process.”

Read more

Related Content

Two Minds. One Future.: Inside the UnitedLex Summit 2026

Panel topics were shaped by conversations with clients, partners, and peers across the legal industry, and prep calls with every speaker kept each discussion rooted in practice rather than theory.

The Patent Race Behind Quantum Computing

A massive patent portfolio is not necessarily proof of technological superiority, but it is an incredibly effective tool for market control.

Why Legal Ops AI Programs Stall: Vendor Demos Precede Clear Objectives

AI governance, data quality, and organizational readiness all depend on that outcome, with each one changing depending on the goals.

The AI Patent Platform Review: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Best-Fit Use Cases

Corporate IP strategists, innovation leaders, and highly-invested executives seeking portfolio-level insights and competitive intelligence.